×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

CAN/DGSI 127, Age Assurance Technologies

Technical Committee Review

This document specifies minimum requirements for age assurance technologies and methods to verify a person’s age or estimate their age range.

This document is platform-agnostic.

DATE POSTED: March 26, 2025

DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS: April 18, 2025
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Comment Drag

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment

Beckett LeClair Mar 31 2025 at 11:22AM on page 16

Editorial
Would it be better to phrase this as something like: where the service has assured the user's age they will deliver content appropriate to that age, and where they don't know the age they will not deliver any content that could be age-inappropriate? This could cover instances where a service offers a high level of protection by default and users must opt into more sensitive content by verifying their age. It would close off loopholes that could come from not uniformly applying assurance.
replies
in reply to Beckett LeClair's comment

Beckett LeClair Mar 31 2025 at 11:15AM on page 12

Editorial
*Should the note
replies

Beckett LeClair Mar 31 2025 at 11:13AM on page 12

Editorial
Sorry, looks like I missed this previously. Should this say the note under relying party also say 'relying', or is 'reply' correct?
replies
View all